Skip to main content

When Can You Stop Saving?

I like to point out, from time to time, the importance of saving and investing.

What if we invert this question? 1. When is not a good time to save? 2. When is it enough? Inversion is a favorite mental hacks of the great investor Charlie Munger.

The first one is easy. When you face an emergency, or have a great opportunity to spend your money on someone/something you love, you should do stop saving temporarily.

The second one is trickier. This relevant for your retirement — this is the time you can stop saving permanently.

Let's say your annual expenditure is X. This, of course, is different from your annual income. If you have accumulated 25X in equity funds, 1X in cash, 1X in debt/liquid funds, and 1X in gold, you can stop saving. You're set.

The goal is to withdraw 4% from the equity fund each year (adjust for inflation as you go along). Generally speaking, this amount (1X) would be compensated by appreciation of the equity markets. You can't do this when the stocks drop more than 25% though. Think the drops of 2008-9 or 2020. This is when you should dip into cash/LF/gold. Replenish the latter when the economy improves. This strategy doesn't work that well for real estate because of the illiquidity associated.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Quotes from "The Social Leap"

These are the lines from William von Hippel in his book “The Social Leap” that I found to be incisive and insightful. “The ability to kill at a distance is the single most important invention in the history of warfare, because weaker individuals can attack stronger individuals from a position of superior numbers and relative safety.” “As if division of labor were not enough, Homo erectus then sealed the deal with the single most important innovation in human history: the control of fire.” “Long before the invention of writing (which is only about five thousand years old), human culture had become cumulative by virtue of our oral storytelling traditions .” “When we weigh up the costs and benefits, we see that farming afforded our ancestors some assurances against starvation, but at the cost of various new illnesses, reduced stature and longevity, excruciating halitosis, and often a far longer working day. The end result was that early farmers worked harder to achieve a worse life than ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Upside of Disaster

In the previous post , I talked about the tactics rational optimists use to deal with uncertainty: explore and exploit. There are situations where an utter disaster and the resulting uncertainty can change the history for the better. An amazing example is the story of human evolution from chimp-like apes. Here's a brief review of the story told by William von Hippel in “ The Social Leap .” These apes lived in the rainforests of eastern Africa, around 6 million years ago. They ruled the canopy. But then disaster struck. Eastern Africa was tearing away from the rest of the continent, due to plate tectonics. The climate changed. The rainforests disappeared. These apes had to adjust to living in the savannah, at the mercy of great predators. Humans reacted to this disaster by innovating and inventing. Human distinctions — from bipedalism, persistence hunting, to the use of language and tools and our social structure — ultimately are the results of that disaster. They learned to be grea...
Post a Comment
Read more

Gore-Tex and Serendipity

 In the NYT, I read the obituary of Robert Gore , the inventor of Gore-Tex. Gore-Tex is a porous material made of teflon (made of carbon and fluorine atoms; it repels water very easily). If you have used a hiking equipment, from tents to shoes to jackets, chances are that you've used Gore-Tex. He discovered the material by happenstance: "Mr. Gore sought to make more efficient use of the material by stretching it, not unlike Silly Putty. But each time he heated and stretched a rod of PTFE in his lab, it broke in two. “Everything I seemed to do worked worse than what we were already doing,” he told the Science History Institute in a short film. “So I decided to give one of these rods a huge stretch, fast — a jerk. I gave it a huge jerk and it stretched 1,000 percent. I was stunned.”" It's a story that appeals to the chemist in me. It takes a tinkerer to test unlikely scenarios — it's not easy to acknowledge the limit of one's knowledge. For a chemical engineer, ...
Post a Comment
Read more